6 April 2026
Where are we in the Cycle?
Four guideposts are now "flashing amber" suggesting a transition from
unfavourable conditions to the onset of more favourable cyclical outcomes.
Sluggish productivity growth, exacerbated by war in Europe and the middle
east, intensifying trade restrictions and ongoing central bank worries about
inflation, have been a continuing constraint on raw material demand
expansion. Near term metal market supply anxieties have dissipated. US
dollar strength has given way to a more neutral influence on prices. Global
monetary conditions have slowly become less restrictive to the point that
they have taken the next step toward offering modest cyclical support.
Overall, the guideposts are suggesting moderately more favourable cyclical
outcomes without yet displaying the full array of signs consistent with a
durable or prolonged price cycle.
More...
Market Directions
The constraints on capital flows connecting retail equity investors to
the riskiest end of the market have loosened considerably adding to the
flows of professional money which, having been unaffected by sticky
inflationary outcomes or the risk of recession, had been supporting the most
growth oriented and well-established businesses in the industry. Heavily
hyped energy storage innovations are yet to affect metal demand as
meaningfully as once expected. Metal price risk premiums are finally
impacting related equity valuations. The first crack in the 1990s-style
investment performance - when modest sector equity price gains occurred in
the midst of sometimes highly disruptive macro conditions - has appeared.
More...
Portfolio Performance and Positioning
The transition to more stable conditions a week earlier translated into
similarly sized gains across all three development categories in the past
week with a large majority of stocks making positive contributions. While
Phase I stocks had began a recovery from deeply depressed prices during the
third quarter of 2025, a dearth of mineral discoveries continues to hinder a
more consistent valuation uplift. Pressures on Phase II stocks have risen,
despite their demonstrable production potential and expected proximity to
profits, as sometimes weak balance sheets and heavy reliance on execution
success test often unproven management, in even the best of market
conditions. The Phase III category, although comprising companies with
stronger commercial credentials, is the group most sensitive to capital
allocation decisions among institutional fund managers responding to
changing sector valuations and competing macro growth assessments. More...
Stock Reviews and Rating Analysis
PortfolioDirect rating reports analyse the quality and risk
attributes of proposed mineral developments. Rating criteria apply to mining and oil and gas stocks at any stage of
development. PortfolioDirect uses a five point rating
scale to measure the risk adjusted quality of proposed mineral developments
or companies.
More...
The 'Steak or Sizzle' blog provides summary judgements on
the top performing ASX-listed resources stocks.
More...