6 October 2025
Where are we in the Cycle?
Four guideposts are now "flashing amber" after the recent swing in
sentiment about global prospects offered a fresh "red" warning sign.
Sluggish productivity growth, exacerbated by war in Europe, intensifying
trade restrictions and ongoing central bank worries about inflation, have
been a continuing constraint on raw material demand expansion. Global monetary conditions are only
slowly becoming less restrictive. Metal market supply anxieties have dissipated. US dollar
strength has given way to a more neutral influence on prices. Overall,
the guideposts are suggesting a low point in the cycle without yet
displaying conclusive signs of a cyclical turn.
More...
Market Directions
The constraints on capital flows connecting retail equity investors to
the riskiest end of the market have loosened over the past 6-8 weeks adding
to the flows of professional money which, having discounted a recession and
been unaffected by inflationary pressures, had been supporting the most growth oriented and well-established businesses
in the industry. Heavily hyped energy storage innovations are yet to affect metal demand as
meaningfully as once expected. Higher metal price risk premiums,
where evident, have struggled to impact related equity
valuations. The first crack in the
1990s-style investment performance - when modest sector equity price gains
occurred in the midst of sometimes highly disruptive macro conditions -
has appeared.
More...
Portfolio Performance and Positioning
All three development categories posted gains in the past week adding to
the strong recovery in the past month, most noticeably among the stocks
within the Phase I and Phase II groups. Despite signs of a cyclical recovery
in deeply depressed prices over the past three months,
a continuing dearth of mineral discoveries, adversely affecting their
ability to attract individual shareholders, remains the biggest hindrance to
the ongoing performance of exploration oriented companies. Performance of
companies in the Phase II development category remain under pressure,
despite demonstrable production potential and expected proximity to
profits. Risks arising from relatively high indebtedness and heavy reliance
on execution success in sometimes unfamiliar markets and untested management
are impeding their returns. The Phase III category, although less volatile,
is the most sensitive to capital allocation decisions among institutional
fund managers responding to changing sector valuations and relative macro
growth expectations. More...
Stock Reviews and Rating Analysis
PortfolioDirect rating reports analyse the quality and risk
attributes of proposed mineral developments. Rating criteria apply to mining and oil and gas stocks at any stage of
development. PortfolioDirect uses a five point rating
scale to measure the risk adjusted quality of proposed mineral developments
or companies.
More...
The 'Steak or Sizzle' blog provides summary judgements on
the top performing ASX-listed resources stocks.
More...