10 November 2025
Where are we in the Cycle?
Four guideposts are now "flashing amber" after the recent swing in
sentiment about global prospects offered a fresh "red" warning sign.
Sluggish productivity growth, exacerbated by war in Europe, intensifying
trade restrictions and ongoing central bank worries about inflation, have
been a continuing constraint on raw material demand expansion. Global monetary conditions are only
slowly becoming less restrictive. Metal market supply anxieties have dissipated. US dollar
strength has given way to a more neutral influence on prices. Overall,
the guideposts are suggesting a low point in the cycle without yet
displaying conclusive signs of a cyclical turn.
More...
Market Directions
The constraints on capital flows connecting retail equity investors to
the riskiest end of the market have loosened over the past three months
adding to the flows of professional money which, having discounted a
recession and been unaffected by inflationary pressures, had been supporting
the most growth oriented and well-established businesses in the industry.
Heavily hyped energy storage innovations are yet to affect metal demand as
meaningfully as once expected. Higher metal price risk premiums, where
evident, have struggled to impact related equity valuations. The first
crack in the 1990s-style investment performance - when modest sector equity
price gains occurred in the midst of sometimes highly disruptive macro
conditions - has appeared.
More...
Portfolio Performance and Positioning
Losses persisted across all development categories with the Phase II
group most adversely affected as a stock long suspended from trading was
reinstated as a substantially lower valuation. Results for the best
established companies again fared best. Despite a partial cyclical recovery
from deeply depressed prices in recent months, the biggest hindrance to the
ongoing investment performance of exploration oriented companies remains a
continuing dearth of mineral discoveries. Performance of companies in the
Phase II development category also remain under pressure, despite their
demonstrable production potential and expected proximity to profits, as
relatively high indebtedness and heavy reliance on execution success in
sometimes unfamiliar markets test often unproven management. The Phase III
category, although comprising companies with stronger commercial credentials
and a less volatile returns profile, is the group most sensitive to capital
allocation decisions among institutional fund managers responding to
changing sector valuations and relative macro growth expectations. More...
Stock Reviews and Rating Analysis
PortfolioDirect rating reports analyse the quality and risk
attributes of proposed mineral developments. Rating criteria apply to mining and oil and gas stocks at any stage of
development. PortfolioDirect uses a five point rating
scale to measure the risk adjusted quality of proposed mineral developments
or companies.
More...
The 'Steak or Sizzle' blog provides summary judgements on
the top performing ASX-listed resources stocks.
More...