14 April March 2025
Where are we in the Cycle?
All five PortfolioDirect cyclical guideposts are flashing ‘amber’ with
the Chinese growth momentum the last indicator to switch from ‘red’ after
stabilising in the latter half of 2024. Global monetary conditions are only
slowly becoming less restrictive. Sluggish productivity growth, exacerbated
by war in Europe, intensifying trade restrictions and ongoing central bank
worries about inflation, have been a continuing constraint on raw material
demand expansion. Metal market supply anxieties have dissipated. US dollar
strength has given way to a more neutral influence on prices. The guideposts are
suggesting a low point in the cycle without yet offering the necessary signs
of a conclusive cyclical turn.
More...
Market Directions
Capital flows connected to retail equity investors remain constrained by
the continuing impact of prior inflation on household savings and income.
Professional money, having discounted a recession until now, has provided
market relief for the most growth oriented and well-established businesses
although emerging trade rivalries are threatening a reversal.
Heavily hyped energy storage innovations are yet to affect metal demand as
meaningfully as once expected. Nor have higher metal price risk premiums,
where evident, had a correspondingly beneficial impact on related equity
valuations. Persistence of a
1990s-style investment performance - when modest sector equity price gains
occurred in the midst of sometimes highly disruptive macro conditions -
remains the underlying theme.
More...
Portfolio Performance and Positioning
President Trump’s delay in implementing punitive tariffs, directed at
reversing US trade imbalances, benefitted equity prices. Unsurprisingly,
the companies benefitting most had suffered the largest losses in the prior
week. The tariff-related price action has come just as easing pressures on
household budgets had started to encourage speculative market flows,
although a continuing dearth of mineral discovery success has remained the
most potent hindrance to the performance of the earliest stage companies.
Performance of companies in the Phase II development category remain under
pressure, despite demonstrable production potential and expected proximity
to profits, due to risks arising from relatively high indebtedness and heavy
reliance on execution success in sometimes unfamiliar markets and untested
management. The Phase III category, although less volatile, is the most
sensitive to capital allocation decisions among institutional fund managers
responding to changing sector valuations and relative macro growth
expectations.
More...
Stock Reviews and Rating Analysis
PortfolioDirect rating reports analyse the quality and risk
attributes of proposed mineral developments. Rating criteria apply to mining and oil and gas stocks at any stage of
development. PortfolioDirect uses a five point rating
scale to measure the risk adjusted quality of proposed mineral developments
or companies.
More...
The 'Steak or Sizzle' blog provides summary judgements on
the top performing ASX-listed resources stocks.
More...