Report Date: 2 April 2018
The Mining Strategist
The Current View
A lengthy downtrend in sector prices had given way to a relatively stable trajectory after mid 2013 similar to that experienced in the latter part of the 1990s and first few years of the 2000s.
The late 1990s and early 2000s was a period of macroeconomic upheaval during which time sector pricing nonetheless proved relatively stable.
Relative stability suggests a chance for companies genuinely adding value through development success to see their share prices move higher. This was the experience in the late 1990s and early 2000s.
Still vulnerable cyclical conditions were aggravated in the second half of 2015 by a push from investors worldwide to reduce risk. Sector prices were pushed to a new cyclical low. These conditions were reversed through 2016 and 2017 although sector prices have done little more than revert to the 2013 levels which had once been regarded as cyclically weak.
With a median decline in prices of ASX-listed resources companies through the cycle of 89%(and 30% of companies suffering a decline of more then 95%), the majority of stocks remain prone to strong 'bottom of the cycle' leverage in response to even slight improvements in conditions.
Has Anything Changed?
The strength of the US dollar exchange rate since mid 2014 had added an unusual weight to US dollar prices. Reversal of some of the currency gains has been adding to commodity price strength through 2017.
Signs of cyclical stabilisation in sector equity prices has meant some very strong ‘bottom of the cycle’ gains.
Funding for project development has passed its most difficult phase with the appearance of a stronger risk appetite.
Resource Sector Weekly Returns
Market Breadth Statistics
Equity Markets
Talk of a global trade war and its potential impact on growth damaged market sentiment. The impact was modified by news that the US and Chinese governments were talking in the background about intellectual property rights and access by US companies to Chinese markets.
In any event, President Donald Trump has signed off on a range of measures aimed at China to which China has promised a response.
Technology stocks were also affected adversely by ongoing criticisms of social media privacy management.
Other technology companies faced a range of problems including scepticism about how some will be able to monetise their large user bases. Tesla faced doubts about its production momentum. Autonomous drive vehicle tests have been disrupted, affecting several technology and traditional motor vehicle manufacturers, by a fatal collision in Arizona. President Donald Trump reopened old wounds with another attack on the business practices of Amazon.
The financial services sector lost ground as the decline in bond yields was taken as a sign of potentially compressed margins.
Outside the US, markets were under pressure from adverse currency moves and, in Europe, doubts about financial sector credit and asset quality.
Meanwhile, strong earnings growth is expected in the first quarter of 2018 as companies begin reporting over the coming few days and through the remainder of April.
The mining sector has been more leveraged to worries about growth arising from a potential trade clash between the USA and China. Industrial sector leaders in the Australian market have continued to outperform resource sector stocks.
Interest Rates
Bond yields have moved lower as optimism about global growth conditions appeared to ebb during the week.
US bond yields have remained unexpectedly low even as US growth expectations have improved with European yields tending to anchor rates around the world. Despite stated beliefs by policymakers about rising inflation, demand for government securities remain strong.
The quality of European corporate debt is making government debt more attractive to hold.
Exchange Rates
The downward directional shift in the US dollar has stalled amidst competing views about relative growth rates, fears about disruption to trade patterns and the funding requirement of the US government.
The newly legislated tax cuts and an omnibus spending bill tailored to get enough votes in both houses of the US Congress suggest longer term downside consistent with a history of a weakening currency occasionally punctuated by unsustained cyclical rises (see page 1).
The upward bias to European and Japanese currencies has constrained the earnings of many internationally oriented companies with bases in those countries.
The gentle upward drift in the Australian dollar could remain intact as long as risks to global economic conditions remain lowered and commodity prices are in the upper end of the range of prices in the past year.
Within that trend, tightening monetary conditions in the USA and, later, in Europe could exert more downward pressure as they occur contributing to within-trend fluctuations.
In the near term, trade disputes between the USA and its major trading partners in Canada, Mexico, Europe, Japan and China could add headwinds for any country potentially caught in the crossfire, including Australia.
Commodity Prices
The general upswing in commodity prices over the past year remains within the bounds of a cyclical trough suggesting still stronger economic activity will be needed to carry prices higher.
Gold & Precious Metals
The gold price has been subjected to a tug of war between the negative effect of higher bond yields and the positive influence of a weaker US dollar. Overlaying those macro factors more recently has been anxiety about the rising trade rivalry between the USA and Europe and China.
The net result of the various factors driving prices had been a sharp rise in gold bullion prices resulting in a break in the link with bond prices.
Prices of Australian gold related stocks have moved within a narrower range than their north American counterparts. Australian prices still sit toward the upper end of the range of outcomes over the past year. In contrast, North American prices are around the lower end of their range.
Both groups of stocks have shown less than historical leverage to higher bullion prices. The North American stocks have shown the stronger connection to financial market conditions over the past month.
Within the precious metal complex, palladium prices remain well ahead of relatively stable gold, silver and platinum prices despite the upward move facing the strongest headwinds in over a year.
Junior gold miner equity prices remain more highly correlated to silver price movements than to gold bullion prices suggesting that both are being influenced more heavily by the same trading attitudes.
Nonferrous Metals
Prices of the main daily traded nonferrous metals had become increasingly correlated as a broadening consensus about the lowered risks to world economic activity emerged.
Tin prices have lagged conspicuously over the past year but showed a similar rise to that of other metals (and a lesser subsequent decline) since late in 2017.
All prices have tended lower as concern about disrupted international trade patterns have intensified and as (still minor and ambiguous) signs of weakness in Chinese activity rates have had an effect.
Bulk Commodities
Bulk commodity prices have moved lower.
Increased Chinese steel production in the first quarter of 2018 has resulted in larger inventories. The inventory climb and threat of tariffs affecting Chinese steel demand dragged steel prices lower in the past week and raised risks for metallurgical coal markets.
Oil and Gas
In a similar reaction to that evident among the gold stocks, US equity prices for oil and gas explorers have been dominated by broader stock market movements rather than movements in the price of crude oil.
Higher US production remains a burden on investor expectations with continuing rises in oil rig productivity supporting higher output.
Battery Metals
Eighteen months of rising lithium-related stock prices has given way to a period of market reassessment as a lengthy pipeline of potential new projects raises the prospect of ongoing supplies being adequate for expected needs.
Potential lithium producers have been able to respond far more quickly to the various market signals than has been the case in other segments of the mining industry.
Battery metals remain a focal point for investors with recent attention moving to cobalt and vanadium.
Uncertainty over how a peaceful transfer of power can occur in the Democratic Republic of the Congo has added a dimension to cobalt prices lacking in other metals caught up in the excitement over transport electrification.
Uranium
The uranium sector is once again moving along the bottom of its long term trading range in the absence of more meaningful signs that power utilities are prepared to re-enter the contract market to negotiate their longer term needs.
The Steak or Sizzle? blog LINK contains additional commentary on the best performed stocks in the sector and the extent to which their investment outcomes are underpinned by a strong enough value proposition to sustain the gains.