Report Date: 2 January 2019

The Mining Strategist

Report Index

  Where Are We In the Cycle?
   Early stage downswing

The Current View

The PortfolioDirect cyclical guideposts suggest that the best possible macroeconomic circumstances for the resources sector will involve a sequence of  upward revisions to global  growth forecasts, the term structure of metal prices once again reflecting rising near term shortages, a weakening US dollar, strong money supply growth rates and positive Chinese growth momentum. 

All  of the five guideposts are "flashing amber" with the potential for at least one to switch to red shortly suggesting the cycle is now struggling to make headway. 

 

Has Anything Changed? - Updated View

From mid 2014, the metal market cyclical position was characterised as ‘Trough Entry’ with all but one of the PortfolioDirect cyclical guideposts - the international policy stance - flashing ‘red’ to indicate the absence of support.  

Through February 2016, the first signs of cyclical improvement in nearly two years started to emerge. The metal price term structure reflected some moderate tightening in market conditions and the guidepost indicator was upgraded to ‘amber’ pending confirmation of further movement in this direction.

As of early December 2016, the Chinese growth momentum indicator was also upgraded to amber reflecting some slight improvement in the reading from the manufacturing sector purchasing managers index. Offsetting this benefit, to some extent, the policy stance indicator was downgraded from green to amber. 

At the end of July 2017, the exchange rate guidepost was upgraded to green.

As 2017 ended, there were emerging signs of economic forecasters beginning a sequence of growth forecast upgrades prompting a revision of the global growth guidepost to "green". 

Three quarters of the way through 2018, global growth appears to have peaked and the US dollar is on the rise both warranting guidepost downgrades. The cyclical positioning has been downgraded to 'downswing'.

As 2019 commences, the balance of cyclical forces is more sharply negative.  Global growth forecasts are coming down and Chinese growth momentum is facing stronger headwinds.

Cyclical Position

The level and direction of metal prices are consistent with a cyclical downswing dating from February 2018 and remarkably close to the average of cyclical changes since 1960.

 Time, of itself, is not important but the sequence of adjustments which are typical of a commodity price cycle and contribute to changed prices and expectations does take time.  A more detailed analysis of metal price cyclical duration is available here.

Halting the cyclical decline now evident would most likely require some combination of higher global growth than currently anticipated, U.S. dollar weakness or more supportive monetary policies.  Each of these three key influences is moving through a transitional phase with none currently pointing in the right direction.

Global Growth - Forecast Revisions

Forecasters are flashing warning signs that global economic growth has begun a downward slide.

The International Monetary Fund confirmed its view, in the October World Economic Outlook, that global growth is likely to have reached a peak during the latter part of 2017.

The Fund downgraded its growth forecast for 2018 and 2019.  The change is important symbolically, even if within the bounds of forecasting error, insofar as it signals emerging disappointment about the outlook and a need for a change in expectations.

Upbeat assessments of the world economy had relied heavily on an extrapolation of what had happened in late 2017.

Global growth accelerated in 2017 from 3.2% to 3.8%, the strongest increase since the recovery from the financial crisis during 2010.   Improving growth outcomes in the second half of 2017 underpinned rising metal usage following an otherwise lacklustre first half.

The strongest increases in metal usage typically occur when global GDP growth is accelerating. From an equity market perspective, rising growth projections are usually a prompt for strategists to raise sectoral fund allocations.  

The expected synchronised growth which had driven expectations through late 2017 and early 2018 (and which would have been critical to an improvement in mining industry fortunes) appears to have dissipated quickly.

The IMF analysis points to average growth rates in the next six years being less than in the last six years.  Key regions of the world – the USA, Europe and emerging Asia – face a downward trending growth outlook. 

Unusually low productivity growth in most advanced economies, reflecting low business investment spending and governments with little enthusiasm for reform agendas, are constraining how quickly global output can expand. 

Legislation to cut taxes in the USA added a near term fiscal stimulus but whether tax cuts support productivity enhancing capital spending in the next several years to sustain a stronger growth base is less certain.

Meanwhile, a threatened departure from the trade liberalisation forces of the past several decades precipitated by the US administration seeking to capture a larger share of world trade endangers global growth prospects and, ultimately, the prosperity of the mining industry.

Whatever the eventual outcome of the recent threats and counter threats over trade, the resulting uncertainties, left to fester, will retard business investment plans.  Signs of this are already evident.

The most important missing piece in the progress of the metal price cycle – a stronger private sector investment commitment – is at risk immediately whatever the eventual impact on trade flows.

US Dollar Exchange Rate - Chart 2

Along with reduced risks to growth, a weaker U.S. dollar contributed to the upward trajectory in metal prices through 2017.  

Over the past 45 years, a 1% fall in the US dollar trade weighted index has come with an average rise of 3% in nonferrous metal prices. 

The downward currency adjustment had reflected some reappraisal of relative growth rates, with more optimism about Europe, and the direction and pace of interest rate changes. Diminished financial stability risks in Europe favoured the euro.

The reduced need in a less risky macro environment for use of the US dollar as a safe haven, as capital flowed more freely to developing economies, also acted against the US dollar. 

Some of these factors were unwound during 2018. European growth lost momentum and attention again focused on the likelihood of US interest rate changes running ahead of moves in Europe. 

Faltering emerging economies also made investors more sceptical about their growth prospects with higher US interest rates raising debt servicing obligations.

Stronger US growth from a tax and spending driven fiscal stimulus have also contributed to a near term reappraisal of economic conditions in favour of the US dollar although US policies are not a sustainable source of upward currency pressure without structural changes to the country's growth potential. 

 In the years ahead, slowing US growth and rising US debt are likely to drag the currency toward its longer term downward trajectory offering medium term support for US dollar denominated commodity prices..

International Policy Stance - Chart 3

Global monetary policies had been after the 2008-09 financial crisis so as to support higher asset prices as a step toward raising demand and creating stronger employment markets.   Commodity prices eventually benefitted from the stronger liquidity flows into speculative markets as well as improvements in real output growth.

As some of the most favourable monetary conditions in modern history are wound back, the mining industry will be relying more heavily on output growth alone and, for that, on the  willingness of governments to foster stronger productivity outcomes to raise global growth potential. Stronger productivity growth will facilitate increases in wages and consumer spending with fewer worries about rising inflation pressures.

The greatest danger to a metal price cycle comes when monetary policy settings begin to tighten in response to higher inflation with an adverse effect on output growth and investment spending. 

In previous cycles, authorities have moved to stem monetary growth rates while metal prices have been on the rise, sometimes quite aggressively. The policy tightening ahs usually ended once metal prices have peaked.

Policy settings are changing more gradually than in the past because competitive forces within labour markets are holding back inflation pressures. The push to more normal settings has also been prolonged because of the extreme starting point and ongoing fears of raid change destabilising financial markets.

Declining growth in US and global money supply attests to continuing tightening in monetary conditions well past the point at which that would have stopped in earlier cycles. The monetary constraints already applied to the global economy, and set to intensify in the absence of a change in direction, are consistent with the metal price cycle being past its peak,

Metal Price Term Structure - Chart 1

Some tightening in nonferrous metal price spreads was led by emerging backwardations in London Metal Exchange lead and zinc prices.  

The tightening in spreads is modest by the standards of what is possible but overall physical market balances did not appear to be changing enough for the shift in premiums to move more dramatically.  Over the past several months, the price premiums have eased and reversed.

The International Copper Study Group (ICSG) has reported that demand for the metal in 2017 rose by 0.7%, the smallest annual increase in demand since 2009.

The succession of million tonne-plus increases in annual copper usage during the first decade of the century, requiring new metal making capacity, is not being reproduced.

The International Lead Zinc Study Group has reported that zinc usage has not changed significantly for four years.

Despite unusually slow growth in metal usage, market balances have been kept in check by declines in mine output.  Constraints on the supply side have helped deliver tighter market conditions than would otherwise have been experienced but these can be reversed.  

With only moderately increasing rates of usage across the major daily traded metals, relatively narrow metal price spreads may indicate market conditions are insufficiently strong (and possibly subject to reversal if producers choose to do so) to carry the cycle significantly further.      With only moderately increasing rates of usage across the major daily traded metals, relatively narrow metal price spreads may indicate market conditions are insufficiently strong (and possibly subject to reversal if producers choose to do so) to carry the cycle significantly further.      

Chinese Growth Momentum - Chart 4

Chinese manufacturing has enjoyed a prolonged expansion since early 2017 which has helped build positive sentiment for investments in the mining sector (as illustrated in the fourth chart in the right hand panel and the view below of the most recent five years).

China's official statistical agency reported that GDP had grown by 1.4%, or at an annualised rate of 5.7%, in the March quarter of 2018.  The relatively slow pace of growth if maintained would have fallen significantly short of the growth targeted by Chinese leaders. Chinese growth is destined to head lower in coming years but China has consistently met annual statistical goals in recent years through periodic growth surges.  The same occurred in 2018.

The Chinese government has announced that GDP rose by 6.5% over the year to September 2018 with a quarterly growth rate of 1.6%.

Accepting the accuracy of the data, the government appears to have been able to do just enough to meet its targets.  As this becomes progressively harder, Chinese policymakers will be forced to gradually guide expectations lower.

Current Chinese growth rates remain highly dependent on bank lending despite widespread agreement that the flow of funds is creating longer term distortions which will need addressing.  

More accommodating policy settings than have been in place for the past several years are highly unlikely, biasing any cyclical risks for raw material markets to the downside.  

The restructuring of the Chinese economy with a resulting contraction in the contribution to Chinese GDP of investment spending will have a generally detrimental effect on raw material demand.

Chinese steel production in 2017 was higher than in 2016 but little different from four years earlier.

Other signs of subdued momentum have been evident in statistics released by the International Copper Study Group and the International Lead Zinc Study Group.

         

 

The chart illustrates the cyclical classifications used to define the positioning of the metal markets.  The cyclical positioning informs recommendations about the allocation of funds within the sector.

Using the prices of the six main daily traded base metals - aluminium, copper, lead, nickel, tin and zinc - the blue line in the chart shows, for the nine price cycles since 1960, the profile of the average adjustment following each cyclical price peak.

The average magnitude of the peak to trough price fall across the nine cycles has been 29%.  The shortest adjustment period occurred in the 14 months after September 2000 when the price indicator fell 31%. The most drawn out adjustments have taken 29 months after prices peaked in February 1980 and in February 1989.  In each instance, prices fell 42%.

The cyan line in the chart is the trajectory of the cycle which peaked in February 2018 after 43 months.

The red line is based on a cyclical peak having occurred in February 2018.  The change in direction is tracking the average of historical cycles closely after 10 months to the end of December 2018.

CYCLICAL GUIDEPOST CHARTS
PortfolioDirect