Report Date: 16 November 2015

PortfolioDirect/resources

Report Index

  Where Are We In the Cycle?
   Metal Prices Return to Trough Entry Phase

The Current View

Growth in demand for raw materials peaked in late 2010.  Since then, supply growth has continued to outstrip demand leading to inventory rebuilding or spare production capacity.  With the risk of shortages greatly reduced, prices have lost their risk premia and are tending toward marginal production costs to rebalance markets.

To move to the next phase of the cycle, an acceleration in global output growth will be required to boost raw material demand by enough to stabilise metal inventories or utilise excess capacity.

The PortfolioDirect cyclical guideposts suggest that the best possible macroeconomic circumstances for the resources sector will involve a sequence of  upward revisions to global  growth forecasts, the term structure of metal prices once again reflecting rising near term shortages, a weakening US dollar, strong money supply growth rates and positive Chinese growth momentum.  Only one of the five guideposts is "set to green" suggesting the sector remains confined to the bottom of the cycle . 

Has Anything Changed?

Throughout 2014, PortfolioDirect had been characterising the cyclical position as ’Trough Entry’ with some expectation that by the end of 2014 an exit would be evident. Until very late in the year, the evidence supported that possibility before conditions took several backward steps. 

The absence of a growth acceleration among the major economic regions is contributing to the flagging momentum.  A stronger US dollar is also imparting a downward bias to US dollar denominated prices presently.

This change has been enough to define a fresh cycle and a more prolonged adjustment process.

Exchange Rate Driven Cycle
Industrial metal prices remained on a downtrend with a stronger U.S. dollar and weaker global growth momentum contributing to the downward pressure.  

 It is timely to highlight once again the strongly inverse correlation between movements in the U.S. dollar and changes in U.S. dollar denominated metal prices. The chart uses the trade weighted index of exchange rates with the major trading partners of the USA as a proxy for the former and the International Monetary Fund metal price index for the latter.  

For 35 years, a cyclical rise in metal prices has coincided with a declining exchange rate. There are no periods of any significant length in which a rising exchange rate has coincided with rising metal prices.  

Most of the emphasis for metal price forecasters, including company executives commenting on the future direction of prices, is on changing physical market balances.  The exchange rate is an added complication that cannot be ignored.  

Exchange rate movements will offer some financial cushioning for metal producers outside the USA when markets are relatively weak.  Generally, however, exchange rate movements will not be sufficient to compensate for declines in metal prices.  

Exchange rate movements will have implications for the competitiveness of companies in different locations. Companies in some locations will be more favourably positioned than others to the extent a relatively high proportion of their costs are denominated in a relatively weak currency. 

Uranium’s Biggest Producer Gets Price Rise
The Kazakhstan tenge exchange rate (303 to the US dollar) continues to move lower as the country’s central bank has allowed it to float.  This would normally be of little consequence for anyone outside Kazakhstan but for the fact the country accounts for 41% of the world’s uranium production (2014). 

For the Kazakhstan uranium industry, the price has effectively risen 72% over the past year and 109% over two years while the US dollar price of the energy feedstock has remained near a long term cyclical trough.

There are numerous forces at work restraining global uranium prices but markets are strangely quiet about the impact of these currency moves.  Historically, there have been outcries over exchange rate devaluations by major metal producers such as those in Africa and Latin America which have been perceived as taking unfair advantage from favourable currency outcomes and, in doing so, preventing markets from re-balancing as quickly as they otherwise could.

 

The chart illustrates the four cyclical classifications used by the E.I.M. investment managers to define the positioning of the metal markets.  The investment managers use the cyclical positioning to inform their recommendations about the allocation of funds within the sector.

Using the prices of the six main daily traded base metals - aluminium, copper, lead, nickel, tin and zinc - the blue line in the chart shows, for the nine price cycles since 1960, the profile of the average adjustment following each cyclical price peak.

The average magnitude of the peak to trough price fall across the nine cycles has been 29%.  The shortest adjustment period occurred in the 14 months after September 2000 when the price indicator fell 31%. The most drawn out adjustments have taken 29 months after prices peaked in February 1980 and in February 1989.  In each instance, prices fell 42%.

The cyan line in the chart is the trajectory of the current cycle which was 14 months old at the end of September 2015.

CYCLICAL GUIDEPOST CHARTS
PortfolioDirect
E.I.M. Capital Managers