Report Date: 13 April 2015

PortfolioDirect/resources

Report Index

  Where Are We In the Cycle?
   Metal Prices Approaching Trough Exit Phase

The Current View

Growth in demand for raw materials peaked in late 2010.  Since then, supply growth has continued to outstrip demand leading to inventory rebuilding or spare production capacity.  With the risk of shortages greatly reduced, prices have lost their risk premia and are tending toward marginal production costs to rebalance markets.

To move to the next phase of the cycle, an acceleration in global output growth will be required to boost raw material demand by enough to stabilise metal inventories or utilise excess capacity.

The PortfolioDirect cyclical guideposts suggest that the best possible macroeconomic circumstances for the resources sector will involve a sequence of  upward revisions to global  growth forecasts, the term structure of metal prices once again reflecting rising near term shortages, a weakening US dollar, strong money supply growth rates and positive Chinese growth momentum.  Only one of the five guideposts is "set to green" suggesting the sector remains confined to the bottom of the cycle . 

Has Anything Changed?

Throughout 2014, PortfolioDirect had been characterising the cyclical position as ’Trough Entry’ with some expectation that by the end of 2015 an exit would be evident. Until very late in the year, the evidence supported that possibility before conditions took several backward steps. 

The absence of a growth acceleration among the major economic regions other than the USA is contributing to the flagging momentum.  A stronger US dollar is also imparting a downward bias to US dollar denominated prices presently. This is looking less like a temporary move than a multiyear change of direction. 

The ECB has foreshadowed more monetary stimulus measures.  However, monetary polices supporting asset prices alone are unable to directly affect growth sufficiently to encourage a better outlook for resource sector equities.

Fears about the impact of low oil prices have affected sentiment adversely. The beneficial effect of lower oil prices on demand within the advanced economies has not yet been felt and is still being underestimated as a source of additional output growth.  

Low US Investment More Cyclical than Structural  
Relative to business profitability, US private sector investment spending (shown in the red line) has been lower than at any time since the late 1940s and has shown no sign of rising.  This is of particular significance for raw material commodity markets whose fortunes are normally tied to a rise in relatively metal intensive investment spending.  A speeding up of the commodity price cycle will most likely need a rising investment contribution to growth. 

The low propensity to invest from profits has led to worries that structural impediments to investment might prolong a cyclical trough in raw material markets.

Relative to sales (shown in blue), on the other hand, the discrepancy between current conditions and historical performance is less evident. 

Investment spending typically rises after a period of sales growth as optimism about market conditions grows and, from a practical standpoint, there is a need for additional production capacity.  Investment spending has been rising, as one would expect. 

The apparent reticence to invest implied by the comparison with profits is due to cyclical factors rather than structural impediments such as lending constraints imposed by financial institutions. 

The numbers imply that sales margins have been expanding through the cycle without a corresponding need for additional investment spending and that sales have not been rising strongly enough to warrant business committing a larger share of profits to investment.

Chinese Steel Producers Sustain Record Output  
Chinese steel production in the first two months of 2015 is estimated by the World Steel Association to have fallen by 0.2% compared with the corresponding period in 2014.  This could be viewed as no growth or, alternatively, as steel production being kept at a record level after having grown by 66% since 2007. 

Whatever interpretation one adopts, the results are consistent with China's transition to a less metal intensive economy.  This was always to be expected despite some in the iron ore industry unrealistically expressing surprise or doubt about growth coming to an end. 

In 2014, for example, China opened approximately 8,000 kilometres of new rail line.  In 2015, the national government is aiming to do something similar.  It would be analytically unreasonable to expect the quantity of rail lines being laid to go on increasing indefinitely.  Simply sustaining the current rate of elevated use is a challenge. 

Many of the uses of steel do not lend themselves to neverending growth.  This is particularly so in infrastructure construction.  The same constraint does not necessarily apply to other metals such as aluminium, nickel and copper which, like all metals, have a connection with infrastructure but are also driven by population and income growth affecting private decision making. 

Quite possibly, the steel intensity of Chinese economic activity will decline even as the intensity of use of other metals more capable of sustaining growth in the long term is on the rise. 

A Dent in the Prospects for Lithium  
An ultrafast rechargeable aluminium-ion battery is the subject of a report in the science journal Nature on 6 April.  The research by a group of chemists at Stanford University contends that a newly developed form of aluminium-ion battery will recharge faster and last up to seven times longer than the equivalent lithium-ion battery and also offer a safer alternative to batteries using flammable electrolyte. 

 A development such as this puts a dent in the expectations of those touting lithium as the prime beneficiary of the search for energy storage alternatives. 

Whether true or not, the clearer investment message is that simply extrapolating current knowledge bases into the future is fraught with danger.  There are smart people around the world looking for better ways to store energy and, implicitly, attempting to make current knowledge (and assertions of impregnable margins from current products) redundant.  What we know today about the subject will almost certainly end up looking like the equivalent of purple flared trousers as a fashion statement.

 

 

 

The chart illustrates the four cyclical classifications used by the E.I.M. investment managers to define the positioning of the metal markets.  The investment managers use the cyclical positioning to inform their recommendations about the allocation of funds within the sector.

Using the prices of the six main daily traded base metals - aluminium, copper, lead, nickel, tin and zinc - the blue line in the chart shows, for the nine price cycles since 1960, the profile of the average adjustment following each cyclical price peak.

The average magnitude of the peak to trough price fall across the nine cycles has been 29%.  The shortest adjustment period occurred in the 14 months after September 2000 when the price indicator fell 31%. The most drawn out adjustments have taken 29 months after prices peaked in February 1980 and in February 1989.  In each instance, prices fell 42%.

The red line in the chart is the trajectory of the current cycle which was 46 months old at the end of February 2015.

PortfolioDirect
E.I.M. Capital Managers